Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: An Initial Report.

OBJECTIVES: The extent and timing of surgery in severely injured patients remains an unsolved problem in orthopaedic trauma. Different laboratory values or scores have been used to try to predict mortality and estimate physiological reserve. The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) has been validated as an electronic medical record-integrated algorithm to help with operative timing in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with PTIM and how it relates to other scores. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of level 1 and level 2 trauma patients admitted to our institution between December 2020 and November 2022 was conducted. Patients scored with PTIM with orthopaedic injuries were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18 years. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-four patients (246 female patients) with a median age of 40.5 (18-101) were included. Mortality was 3.1%. Patients in the PTIM high-risk category (≥0.5) had a 20% mortality rate. The median PTIM was 0.075 (0-0.89) and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9.0 (1-59). PTIM (P < 0.001) and ISS (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in surviving patients. PTIM was mentioned in 7.6% of cases, and in 1.7% of cases, providers indicated an action in response to the PTIM. PTIM and ISS were significantly higher in patients with documented PTIM. CONCLUSION: PTIM is better at predicting mortality compared with ISS. Our low rate of PTIM documentation in provider notes highlights the challenges of implementing a new algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Percutaneous screw fixation of the pubic symphysis versus plate osteosynthesis: a biomechanical study.

Objectives: To compare the stability of screw fixation with that of plate fixation for symphyseal injuries in a vertically unstable pelvic injury (AO/Tile 61-C1) associated with complete disruption of the sacroiliac joint and the pubic symphysis. Methods: Eight fourth-generation composite pelvis models with sacroiliac and pubic symphyseal disruption (Sawbones, Vashon Island, WA) underwent biomechanical testing simulating static single-leg stance. Four were fixed anteriorly with a symphyseal screw, and 4 with a symphyseal plate. All had single transsacral screw fixation posteriorly. Displacement and rotation were monitored at both sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis. Results: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for mean maximum force generated. There was no significant difference in net displacement at both sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis. There was significantly less rotation but more displacement in the screw group in the Z-axis. The screw group showed increased stiffness compared with the plate group. Conclusions: This is the first biomechanical study to compare screw versus plate symphyseal fixation in a Tile C model. Our biomechanical model using anterior and posterior fixation demonstrates that symphyseal screws may be a viable alternative to classically described symphyseal plating.

Percutaneous screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption: A preliminary report.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous techniques are commonly used to treat pelvic ring disruptions but are not mainstream for fixation of pubic symphysis disruption worldwide. Potential advantages include less blood loss and lower risk of surgical site infection, especially in the morbidly obese or multiply injured patient. This study was performed to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients after percutaneous reduction and screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption and to evaluate the preliminary safety and efficacy of this technique and its appropriateness for further study as an alternative method of fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent percutaneous fixation of pubic symphysis disruption by two surgeons at an academic Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Patients underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation of the pubic symphysis using 1 or 2 fully or partially threaded 5.5, 6.5, or 7.3 mm cannulated screws in a transverse or oblique configuration. Associated posterior ring injuries were fixed with trans-sacral and/or iliosacral screws. The primary outcome of interest was loss of reduction, defined as symphysis distance greater than 15 mm measured on final AP pelvis radiograph. Secondary outcomes collected by chart review were operative time, blood loss, vascular or urologic injury, sexual dysfunction, infection, implant loosening or breakage, and revision surgery. RESULTS: Twelve patients met criteria and primary and secondary outcomes were collected. Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up were 15 months each. One patient lost reduction. Mean operative time and blood loss were 124 min and 29 cc, respectively. No vascular or urologic injuries occurred. Two patients reported sexual dysfunction. No patients became infected or required revision surgery. Four patients underwent implant removal. Seventeen additional patients were excluded due to short follow-up and limited outcomes were collected. Two of these patients lost reduction. Three underwent implant removal. CONCLUSION: These data support percutaneous reduction and screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption as a potentially safe and effective method of treatment that warrants further investigation.

Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality: Real-Time Predictive Model for Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Vital signs and laboratory values are used to guide decisions to use damage control techniques in lieu of early definitive fracture fixation. Previous models attempted to predict mortality risk but have limited utility. There is a need for a dynamic model that captures evolving physiologic changes during a trauma patient's hospital course. METHODS: The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) is a machine learning algorithm that uses electronic medical record data to predict mortality within 48 hours during the first 3 days of hospitalization. It updates every hour, recalculating as physiology changes. The model was developed using 1935 trauma patient encounters from 2009 to 2014 and validated on 516 patient encounters from 2015 to 2016. Model performance was evaluated statistically. Data were collected retrospectively on its performance after 1 year of clinical use. RESULTS: In the validation data set, PTIM accurately predicted 52 of the sixty-three 12-hour time intervals within 48 hours of mortality, for sensitivity of 82.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 73.1%-91.9%]. The specificity was 93.6% (95% CI, 92.5%-94.8%), and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 32.5% (95% CI, 25.2%-39.7%). PTIM predicted survival for 1608 time intervals and was incorrect only 11 times, yielding a negative predictive value of 99.3% (95% CI, 98.9%-99.7%). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94.During the first year of clinical use, when used in 776 patients, the last PTIM score accurately predicted 20 of the twenty-three 12-hour time intervals within 48 hours of mortality, for sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI, 73%-100%). The specificity was 94.7% (95% CI, 93%-96%), and the positive predictive value was 33.3% (95% CI, 21.4%-45%). The model predicted survival for 716 time intervals and was incorrect 3 times, yielding a negative predictive value of 99.6% (95% CI, 99.1%-100%). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: By adapting with the patient's physiologic response to trauma and relying on electronic medical record data alone, the PTIM overcomes many of the limitations of previous models. It may help inform decision-making for trauma patients early in their hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A systematic review of ankle fracture treatment modalities in diabetic patients.

AIM: This systematic review evaluated the surgical outcomes of various ankle fracture treatment modalities in patients with Diabetes Mellitus as well as the methodological quality of the studies. METHODS: For our review, four online databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). The overall methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. Data regarding diabetic ankle fractures were pooled into three outcomes groups for comparison: (1) the standard fixation cohort with management of diabetic ankle fractures using ORIF with small or mini fragment internal fixation techniques following AO principles, (2) the minimally invasive cohort with diabetic ankle fracture management utilizing percutaneous cannulated screws or intramedullary fixation, and (3) the combined construct cohort treated with a combination of ORIF and another construct (transarticular or external fixation). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 2228 potential studies from the four databases and 11 were included in the final review. Compared to the standard fixation cohort, the minimally invasive cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration and the combined constructs cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration, surgical site infection and nonunion. Limb salvage rates were similar for the standard fixation and minimally invasive cohorts; however, the combined constructs cohort had a significantly lower limb salvage rate compared to that of the standard fixation cohort. The mean Coleman Methodology Score indicated the quality of the studies in the review was poor and consistent with its limitations. DISCUSSION: The overall quality of published studies on operative treatment of diabetic ankle fractures is low. Treating diabetic ankle fractures operatively results in a high number of complications regardless of fixation method. However, limb salvage rates remain high overall at 97.9% at a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. To achieve improved limb salvage rates and decrease complications, it is critical is to follow basic AO principles, respect the soft tissue envelope or utilize minimally invasive techniques, and be wary that certain combined constructs may be associated with higher complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

What's New in Percutaneous Pelvis Fracture Surgery?

Percutaneous reduction and fixation of pelvic ring fractures is now widely accepted as a safe and effective treatment method. The only exception remains reduction and fixation of pubic symphyseal injuries. Several units from China and one from Spain have published clinical and biomechanical studies supporting percutaneous reduction and fixation of the pubic symphysis with various screw configurations. The initial clinical results are promising. Biomechanical data show there is little difference between plate and screw fixation. We review the current literature and also present a case performed by ourselves using this novel technique.

Vertical shear pelvic ring injuries: do transsacral screws prevent fixation failure?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of fixation failure after transsacral-transiliac (TS) screw fixation of vertical shear (VS) pelvic ring injuries (OTA/AO 61C1) and to describe the mechanism of failure of TS screws. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 academic trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty skeletally mature patients with unilateral, displaced, unequivocal VS injuries were identified between May 1, 2009 and April 31, 2016. Mean age was 31 years and mean follow-up was 14 months. Twelve had sacroiliac dislocations (61C1.2) and eight had vertical sacral fractures (61C1.3). INTERVENTION: Operative treatment with at least one TS screw. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographic failure, defined as a change of >1 cm of combined displacement of the posterior pelvis compared with the intraoperative position on inlet and outlet radiographs. RESULTS: Radiographic failure occurred in 4 of 8 (50%) vertical sacral fractures. Posterior fixation was comprised of a single TS screw in 3 of these 4 failures. The dominant mechanism of screw failure was bending. All of these failures occurred early in the postoperative period. No fixation failures occurred among the sacroiliac dislocations. There were no deep infections or nonunions. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe the mechanism of failure of TS screws in a clinical setting after VS pelvic injuries. We caution surgeons from relying on single TS screw fixation for vertically unstable sacral fractures. Close radiographic monitoring in the first few weeks after surgery is advised. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Technical Considerations and Fluoroscopy in Percutaneous Fixation of the Pelvis and Acetabulum.

Surgical treatment of the pelvic ring and acetabulum continues to evolve. Improved imaging technology and means for closed reduction have meant that percutaneous techniques have gained popularity in the treatment of the pelvic ring and, more recently, in the acetabulum. Potential benefits include decreased soft-tissue dissection, blood loss, and surgical time. However, these are technically demanding procedures that require substantial expertise from both the surgeon and the radiographer. This article details the necessary fluoroscopic views and general methods used in percutaneous techniques around the pelvis and acetabulum. Despite most studies reporting good-to-excellent clinical and radiographic results, further work is needed to facilitate standardization and optimization of these outcomes.

Significant Reduction of Pulmonary Embolism in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To report results of a protocol to lessen incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) among orthopaedic trauma patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic trauma inpatients were included in the study. INTERVENTION: On arrival, an orthopaedic trauma patient's PE risk is calculated using a previously developed tool. If possible, patients at high risk are given their first dose of enoxaparin before leaving the emergency room. If other injuries preclude enoxaparin, then chemoprophylaxis is held for 24 hours. Twenty-four hours after arrival, the patient's ability to receive enoxaparin is reassessed. If possible, enoxaparin is started, with dosing twice a day. If enoxaparin is still contraindicated, a removable inferior vena cava filter is placed. Adequacy of enoxaparin dosing is tested using anti-factor Xa assay, drawn 4 hours after the third dose of enoxaparin. If the anti-factor Xa result is less than 0.2 IU/mL, a removable inferior vena cava filter is placed. If the result is 0.2-0.5 IU/mL, enoxaparin dosing is continued. If greater than 0.5 IU/mL, the dose of enoxaparin is reduced. OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was rate of PE. RESULTS: From September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015, our hospital admitted 420 orthopaedic trauma patients. Fifty-one patients were classed as high risk for PE. In September through December 2015, 9 sustained PE, 1 of which was fatal. From September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, our hospital admitted 368 orthopaedic trauma patients with comparable age and Injury Severity Score to 2015. Forty patients were at high risk for PE, 1 sustained a nonfatal PE. PE incidence from September to December 2016 was significantly lower than in 2015 (P = 0.02). Overall, 26 patients managed under the new protocol had IVCFs placed, 21 had their filters removed, and 3 died with filters in place. There were no complications during filter placement or removal. One patient had hemorrhage felt to be attributable to enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol emphasizes more robust enoxaparin dosing, and more frequent use of IVCF, but only among those at high risk. We lessened the incidence of PE, with a low complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CT-guided Perineural Injections for Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Chronic pelvic pain is a disabling condition that affects a large number of men and women. It may occur after a known inciting event, or it could be idiopathic. A common cause of pelvic pain syndrome is neuropathy of the pelvic nerves, including the femoral and genitofemoral nerves, ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves, pudendal nerve, obturator nerve, lateral and posterior femoral cutaneous nerves, inferior cluneal nerves, inferior rectal nerve, sciatic nerve, superior gluteal nerve, and the spinal nerve roots. Pelvic neuropathy may result from entrapment, trauma, inflammation, or compression or may be iatrogenic, secondary to surgical procedures. Imaging-guided nerve blocks can be used for diagnostic and therapeutic management of pelvic neuropathies. Ultrasonography (US)-guided injections are useful for superficial locations; however, there can be limitations with US, such as its operator dependence, the required skill, and the difficulty in depicting various superficial and deep pelvic nerves. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided injections are radiation free and lead to easy depiction of the nerve because of the superior soft-tissue contrast; although the expense, the required skill, and the limited availability of MR imaging are major hindrances to its widespread use for this purpose. Computed tomography (CT)-guided injections are becoming popular because of the wide availability of CT scanners, the lower cost, and the shorter amount of time required to perform these injections. This article outlines the technique of perineural injection of major pelvic nerves, illustrates the different target sites with representative case examples, and discusses the pitfalls. (©)RSNA, 2016.

Computed Tomography-Based Software Safely Guides Anterograde Percutaneous Anterior and Posterior Column Acetabular Screws.

The objective of this study was to develop three-dimensional (3-D) modeling software to generate the optimal individualized starting points and pathways for anterior and posterior column screws. In this cross-sectional study, 95 consecutive patients from a level I trauma center with noncontrast pelvis computed tomography (CT) images without displaced acetabular fractures were studied. A Java-based program was designed that generated a 3-D graph of pelvic bones and a list was compiled of every potential anterograde anterior and posterior column screw that exited distal to the acetabulum, eliminating screws that did not safely remain within the cortex. The longest safe screw pathway for each patient was determined for both 6.5-mm and 7.3-mm diameter screws. The program was able to identify safe screw pathways for the vast majority of patients (>96%). The study also found that males tolerated significantly longer screws in the anterior column (p < .05), but there was no posterior column difference regarding sex.

Toward a More Robust Prediction of Pulmonary Embolism in Trauma Patients: A Risk Assessment Model Based on 38,000 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but sometimes fatal complication of trauma. Risk stratification models identify patients at increased risk of PE; however, they are often complex and difficult to use. This research aims to develop a model, based on a large sample of trauma patients, which can be easily and quickly used at the time of admission to predict PE. METHODS: This study used trauma registry data from 38,597 trauma patients. Of these, 239 (0.619%) developed a PE. We targeted demographic and injury data, prehospital information, and data on treatments and events during hospitalization. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was developed to predict the odds of developing a PE during hospitalization. The model was developed using a 50% randomly selected development subsample and then tested for accuracy using the remaining 50% validation sample. RESULTS: We found 7 statistically significant predictors of PE, including (1) age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = 0.05], (2) obesity (OR = 2.54; 95% CI, 1.29-4.99; P < 0.01), (3) injury from motorcycle accident (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.25-3.22; P < 0.01), (4) arrival by helicopter (OR = 2.91; 95% CI, 1.16-7.27; P = 0.02), (5) emergency department admission pulse rate (OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.0-1.02; P = 0.06), (6) admission to intensive care unit (OR = 5.03; 95% CI, 3.12-8.12; P < 0.01), and (7) injury location, including thorax (OR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.37; P = 0.03), abdomen (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.33; P = 0.03), and lower extremity injuries (OR = 2.85; 95% CI, 3.12-8.12; P < 0.01). Our model was able to discriminate between predicted and actual PE events with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.87. By identifying the top 25% high-risk patients, we were able to predict 80%-84% of pulmonary emboli. CONCLUSIONS: This knowledge allows us to focus stronger thromboprophylactic efforts on patients at highest risk. This model can be used to rapidly identify trauma patients at high risk for PE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lack of Acute Hand Care in the Southwest United States.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of acute hand injuries and hand infections and to describe the factors associated with the transfer of these patients to a level 1 trauma center. In addition, we sought to understand management before transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients with hand trauma or hand infection transferred to our level 1 trauma center from May 2009 to August 2011. We also identified hospitals with emergency departments (EDs) in our region and surveyed ED providers in these hospitals with regard to acute hand care. SETTING: A level 1 trauma center in the United States. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty consecutive transfers for acute hand care. RESULTS: The average patient age was 38. Most were male (84%), uninsured (51%), and from another county (59%). The average distance of transfer was 51 miles, and 80% were transferred by ground ambulance. The most common reasons for transfer were amputations (24%), infections (21%), lacerations (17%), and fractures/dislocations (16%). Of the 345 hospitals with an ED surveyed, 71% never had hand surgery coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients transferred for acute hand care were young and male, and traveled an average 51 miles to get to our center. More than half of these patients were treated and discharged from our ED. This indicates that a majority may have been managed in a clinic setting. Most EDs in our region do not have a hand surgeon available. Most emergency physicians surveyed had received little training in management of acute hand injuries and hand infections. Further research is needed to identify methods to remove barriers to provision of care for patients with hand trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Improved Survival After Pelvic Fracture: 13-Year Experience at a Single Trauma Center Using a Multidisciplinary Institutional Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze pelvic fracture mortality rates before and after initiation of a multidisciplinary pelvic fracture protocol. DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Prospective data from our Level-I National Trauma Registry of The American College of Surgeons (NTRACS) database. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1682 trauma patients with pelvic fractures from 2000 to 2013 were compared with a control group of 42,629 without pelvic fractures. INTERVENTION: Initiation of a multidisciplinary institutional protocol to guide the initial management of trauma patients with pelvic fractures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were grouped into 3 periods (group 1: 2000-2003, group 2: 2004-2007, group 3: 2008-2013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess associations between mortality and age, shock (systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg), head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale less than or equal to 8), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and time period. RESULTS: Unadjusted mortality rates decreased [12.5%-11.0% (P = 0.72)]; however, ISS increased [19.1-22.7 (P < 0.01)]. Age, shock, head injury, increasing ISS, and earlier period were significantly associated with mortality. Adjusted mortality decreased over time [odds ratio for 2000-2003 vs. 2008-2013: 2.05, 95% confidence interval = (1.26, 3.33) and odds ratio for 2004-2007 vs. 2008-2013: 1.71, 95% confidence interval = (1.09, 2.67)]. From 2000 to 2003, an unstable fracture pattern in the healthiest cohort significantly increased mortality compared with the stable fracture pattern cohort (8.6% and 0.0%, P < 0.01). In subsequent intervals, there was no statistically significant association between stable versus unstable fracture patterns and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusted pelvic fracture mortality rates have significantly decreased over time. In the healthiest patients with unstable pelvic fractures, the mortality rate is now similar to that of patients with stable fracture patterns. With sustained institutional effort to address pelvic fractures, mortality rates can be diminished. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of surgical treatment on mortality after acetabular fracture in the elderly: a multicenter study of 454 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Controversy exists regarding the effect of operative treatment on mortality after acetabular fracture in elderly patients. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would confer a mortality benefit compared with nonoperative treatment even after adjusting for comorbidities associated with death. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Three University Level I Trauma Centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 60 years and older with acetabular fractures treated from 2002 to 2009 were included in the study. Four hundred fifty-four patients were identified with an average age of 74 years. Sixty-seven percent of the study group was male and 33% female. INTERVENTION: One of 4 treatments: nonoperative management with early mobilization, percutaneous reduction and fixation, open reduction and internal fixation, acute total hip arthroplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for covariates of interest. RESULTS: In contrast to previous smaller studies, the overall mortality was relatively low at 16% at 1 year [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-19]. Unadjusted survivorship curves suggested higher 1-year mortality rates for nonoperatively treated patients (21% vs. 13%, P < 0.001); however, nonoperative treatment was associated with other risk factors for higher mortality. By accounting for these patient risk factors, our final multivariate model of survival demonstrated no significant difference in hazard of death for nonoperative treatment (0.92, P = 0.6) nor for any of the 3 operative treatment subgroups (P range, 0.4-0.8). As expected, we did find a significantly increased hazard for factors such as the Charlson comorbidity index [HR, 1.25 per point (95% CI, 1.16-1.34)] and age [HR, 1.08 per year of age more than 70 years (95% CI, 1.05-1.11)]. In addition, associated fracture patterns (compared with elementary patterns) significantly increased the hazard of death with a ratio of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.10-2.06). CONCLUSIONS: The operative treatment of acetabular fractures does not increase or decrease mortality, once comorbidities are taken into account. The reasons for this are unknown. Regardless of the causes, the decision for operative versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric acetabular fractures should not be justified based on the concern for increased or decreased mortality alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Radiographic displacement in pelvic ring disruption: reliability of 3 previously described measurement techniques.

BACKGROUND: The literature on pelvic ring disruptions is based largely on nonstandardized and nonvalidated radiographic outcomes. A thorough review of the literature revealed only 3 described methods for measuring radiographic displacement and 1 frequently used grading system for displacement. We aimed to test the reliability of these previously published radiographic measurement methods and grading system. METHODS: Five separate observers measured radiographic displacement on the standardized pre- and postoperative anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet views of 25 patients with surgically treated Tile B and C pelvic fractures. The readers measured their initial impression based on the Tornetta and Matta grading system (excellent, good, fair, and poor). Next, they measured displacement using the inlet and outlet ratio as described by Sagi, the cross measurement technique as described by Keshishyan, and the absolute displacement method (ADM) as described by Lefaivre. The millimeter measurement obtained by the ADM was converted using the Tornetta and Matta grading system. Each continuous measure was compared for interobserver reliability using intraclass correlations (ICCs), and the categorical outcomes were compared using a kappa statistic. Finally, the relationship of the initial impression to the grade as determined by the ADM was compared using kappa agreement. RESULTS: The agreement among observers based on initial impression was poor (kappa statistic, 0.306) but was fair among those reductions that were excellent (κ = 0.495). Using the Sagi method, the reliability ICC was moderate for the postoperative inlet [0.515, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.338-0.702] and outlet ratio (0.594, 95% CI, 0.423-0.760) but almost perfect in preoperative radiographs (inlet: 0.814, 95% CI, 0.703-0.901; outlet: 0.863, 95% CI, 0.775-0.929). The ICCs for all interpretations of the Keshishyan technique were excellent but were highest when considered as a ratio (preoperative: 0.938, 95% CI, 0.894-0.969; postoperative: 0.912, 95% CI, 0.850-0.955). Using the ADM, the location and film used for measurement had poor agreement, and the ICC for the measurement in millimeters was moderate (preoperative: 0.522, 95% CI, 0.342-0.708; postoperative: 0.432, 95% CI, 0.255-0.634) and the kappa agreement poor when converted using the Tornetta and Matta scale (κ = 0.2190). The agreement between the impression and the converted grade from the ADM was poor (κ = 0.2520). CONCLUSIONS: Radiographic measurement in pelvic x-rays to date has been nonvalidated, and we found the interobserver reliability on common methods, including overall impression and absolute displacement in millimeters, to be poor. The inlet/outlet ratio as described by Sagi was reliable only with wide displacement. The cross measurement technique allows least observer choice and had excellent reliability but does not give a measurement that we can easily interpret based on convention in pelvic fracture description.

Use of inherent anteversion of an intramedullary nail to avoid malrotation in femur fractures.

Rotational malalignment after intramedullary (IM) nailing of femoral fractures remains a significant problem. A technique using intraoperative fluoroscopy and the anteversion inherent to the IM nail for obtaining appropriate femoral rotational alignment is presented. The technique is advocated as a simple alternative to more complex methods for estimation of femoral anteversion during placement of femoral IM nails. This method is simple and requires intraoperative fluoroscopy on the injured extremity alone. It reliably sets the femoral anteversion within a normal physiologic range with minimal additional intraoperative steps and without preoperative measurements.

Methodology and interpretation of radiographic outcomes in surgically treated pelvic fractures: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate previously described methods for the measurement, and interpretation, of radiographic outcomes of operatively treated pelvic fractures. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of the available literature was performed using all major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, MEDLINE IN-PROGRESS, and Cochrane Central) in August 2009. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, or clinical trials regarding orthopaedic treatment of acute traumatic pelvic ring fractures treated surgically in adults, with at least 12 weeks of radiographic follow-up. Exclusion criteria were case reports or case series of <10 patients, review articles, foreign language articles, and series where time frame of outcome measurement was not stated were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Modality, and timeline, of the radiographic assessment was recorded. Next, the description of the method of radiographic measurement technique used was scrutinized for standardization. The interpretation of the radiographic measurement was evaluated, and any grading scale used was recorded. The interpretation of the quality of the radiographic result as described by each author was recorded. Finally, a qualitative methodological analysis was performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Number of standardized radiographic assessment techniques used (3 of 31) and interpretation scales used (13 of 31) were calculated. Nonweighted mean follow-up time (30.6 months) and overall positive radiographic outcomes were calculated (78.6% good or excellent). CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of radiographic outcomes in pelvic fractures has been done using largely unstandardized and universally untested measurement techniques. The interpretations of these measurements are also inconsistent and untested. Substantive future research is needed in this area.

Complications of anterior subcutaneous internal fixation for unstable pelvis fractures: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Stabilization after a pelvic fracture can be accomplished with an anterior external fixator. These devices are uncomfortable for patients and are at risk for infection and loosening, especially in obese patients. As an alternative, we recently developed an anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixation technique (ASPIF). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked if the ASPIF (1) allows for definitive anterior pelvic stabilization of unstable pelvic injuries; (2) is well tolerated by patients for mobility and comfort; and (3) has an acceptable complication rate. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients who incurred an unstable pelvic injury treated with an anterior internal fixator and posterior fixation at four Level I trauma centers. We assessed (1) healing by callous formation on radiographs and the ability to weightbear comfortably; (2) patient function by their ability to sit, stand, lie on their sides, and how well they tolerated the implants; and (3) complications during the observation period. The minimum followup was 6 months (mean, 15 months; range, 6-40 months). RESULTS: All 91 patients were able to sit, stand, and lie on their sides. Injuries healed without loss of reduction in 89 of 91 patients. Complications included six early revisions resulting from technical error and three infections. Irritation of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was reported in 27 of 91 patients and resolved in all but one. Heterotopic ossification around the implants, which was asymptomatic in all cases, occurred in 32 of 91 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The anterior internal fixator provided high rates of union for the anterior injury in unstable pelvic fractures. Patients were able to sit, stand and ambulate without difficulty. Infections and aseptic loosening were reduced but heterotopic ossification and irritation of the LFCN are common. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.